Military law, soldiers and legal rights.

The basic objective of this thesis is to see whether those
subject to military law had in the past, and continue to have,
the same rights and duties as a civilian.
To that end Part 1, which is both narrative and analytical,
traces the development of military law and punishments to
ascertain whether soldiers were punished in the same way, and
with the same severity as civilians. An historical approach is
adopted tracing military law back to its origins in feudalism,
and not simply from the establishment of Cromwell's New Model
Army in the Seventeenth Century, which is traditionally seen as
the forerunner of the modern army. The research for Part 1 was
library based, drawing together disparate materials dealing with
military and civil law and punishments, including, statutes,
official documents (parliamentary debates and reports), and in
relation to military law in particular, handwritten manuscripts
concerning courts-martial and military life.
To the same end, Part 2 of the thesis analyses modern day
military law, as embodied in the Army Act 1955 and subsequent legislation
It compares and analyses the trial process in British military law with that in English civil criminal law,
from pre-arrest investigation to ultimate disposal by appeal or judicial review.

Part 2 considers the military's approach, and its ramifications
for those subject to military law, to certain "rights" which are,
or have been the subject of considerable debate in civil law but
have hitherto received scant, if any consideration at all in a
military context. In particular an analysis is made of the
soldiers position in relation to jury trials, access and
availability of legal aid and representation and sentencing. The
principal sources of material for this part were the Army Act
1955, parliamentary debates and reports, interviews with those
concerned in the administration of military law and, of course,
where available, decided cases. In contrast to Part 1, Part 2 is
largely analytical.

This thesis supplied via ROAR to UEL-registered users is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, and duplication of any part of the material is not permitted, except for your personal use for the purposes of non-commercial research and private study in electronic or print form. You must obtain permission from the copyright-holder for any other use. Electronic or print copies may not be offered, for sale or otherwise, to anyone. No quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement.