Informed, Involved and Influential: The 3 I's model of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care

Article

Stacey, Gemma, Felton, Anne, Houghton, Philip, Hui, Ada, Morgan, Alastair, Shutt, James, Diamond, Bob, Willis, M. and Stickley, Theo 2015. Informed, Involved and Influential: The 3 I's model of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care. Mental Health Practice. 19 (4), pp. 31-35.
AuthorsStacey, Gemma, Felton, Anne, Houghton, Philip, Hui, Ada, Morgan, Alastair, Shutt, James, Diamond, Bob, Willis, M. and Stickley, Theo
Abstract

Collaboration between service users and mental health professionals is at the heart of values based practice and shared decision making. However, there has been limited analysis of the implications of these approaches within a healthcare context that
involves depriving service users of their freedom. This article proposes a framework that aims to promote shared decision making which acknowledges, all participants must be Informed, Involved and Influential in the decision-making process. However,
these are fluid; they refer to a sliding scale of influence that moves between these different positions depending on context, capacity and desire to influence.

KeywordsShared Decision Making; Values Based Practice; Power; Influence
JournalMental Health Practice
Journal citation19 (4), pp. 31-35
ISSN1465-8720
Year2015
PublisherRCN Publishing Ltd
Accepted author manuscript
License
CC BY
Web address (URL)http://journals.rcni.com/doi/10.7748/mhp.19.4.31.s20
Publication dates
Print10 Dec 2015
Publication process dates
Deposited21 Dec 2015
Accepted15 Sep 2015
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/853q1

Log in to edit

Download files

Accepted author manuscript
3Is Pre-Publication.pdf
License: CC BY

  • 613
    total views
  • 679
    total downloads
  • 18
    views this month
  • 54
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis of the experience of being diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder
Gordon, H. B. and Willis, M. 2023. An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis of the experience of being diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder. Journal of Critical Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy. 23 (4), pp. 37-51.
Making sense of burnout: A reflexive thematic analysis of how teachers in England discuss and encounter the term burnout.
Soames, M. and Willis, M. 2023. Making sense of burnout: A reflexive thematic analysis of how teachers in England discuss and encounter the term burnout. Qualitative Health Research. 34 (1-2), pp. 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732323120363
Critical Realism and Qualitative Research in Psychology
Willis, M. 2022. Critical Realism and Qualitative Research in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 20 (2), pp. 265-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2022.2157782
Meta-Study
Ronkainen, N., Wiltshire, G. and Willis, M. 2022. Meta-Study. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 15 (1), pp. 226-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1931941
Bodies, Representations, Situations, Practices: qualitative research on affect, emotion and feeling
Willis, M. and Cromby, J. 2019. Bodies, Representations, Situations, Practices: qualitative research on affect, emotion and feeling. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1656361
How young adults in London experience the Clubhouse Model of mental health recovery: a thematic analysis
Pardi, Jane and Willis, M. 2018. How young adults in London experience the Clubhouse Model of mental health recovery: a thematic analysis. Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health. 5 (2), pp. 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-018-0124-2
England’s Dreaming? UK critical psychology
Cromby, John and Willis, M. 2013. England’s Dreaming? UK critical psychology. Annual Review of Critical Psychology.
Nudging into subjectification: Governmentality and psychometrics
Cromby, John and Willis, M. 2013. Nudging into subjectification: Governmentality and psychometrics. Critical Social Policy. 34 (2), pp. 241-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018313500868
Methodological pluralism in qualitative research: Reflections on a meta-study
Barnes, Jemima, Caddick, Nick, Clarke, Nicola J., Cromby, John, McDermott, Hilary, Willis, M. and Wiltshire, Gareth 2014. Methodological pluralism in qualitative research: Reflections on a meta-study. Qualitative Methods in Psychology. 17 (Spring).
Analytical Pluralism in Qualitative Research: A Meta-Study
Clarke, Nicola J., Willis, M., Barnes, Jemima S., Caddick, Nick, Cromby, John, McDermott, Hilary and Wiltshire, Gareth 2014. Analytical Pluralism in Qualitative Research: A Meta-Study. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 12 (2), pp. 182-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.948980
Affect--or feeling (after Leys)
Cromby, J. and Willis, M. 2016. Affect--or feeling (after Leys). Theory & Psychology. 26 (4), pp. 476-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354316651344
A critical narrative analysis of shared decision-making in acute, inpatient mental health care
Stacey, Gemma, Felton, Anne, Morgan, Alastair, Stickley, Theo, Willis, M., Diamond, Bob, Houghton, Philip, Johnson, Beverley and Dumenya, John 2016. A critical narrative analysis of shared decision-making in acute, inpatient mental health care. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 30 (1), pp. 35-41.