Changes in Art: Market Forces or Evolution

Dickins, Thomas E. (2009) ‘Changes in Art: Market Forces or Evolution’, Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27(2), pp. 159-165.

[img]
Preview
Text
Dickins, TE (2009) ESA 27 (2) 159-165.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives.

Download (50Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?id=t05m18565...

Abstract

Colin Martindale has presented the case for the end of art based on an evolutionary argument that invokes the need for representation and novelty as the key selection pressures. Art is hopelessly doomed to use up novelty and so render itself extinct. In this response I take issue with Martindale’s use of evolutionary theory and then with his notion of novelty. I conclude that a better conceptual framework might be that of the market and of game theory. To begin with, however, I briefly outline evolutionary theory in order to lay the groundwork for subsequent arguments.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Citation: Dickins, T.E (2009) ‘Changes in Art: Market Forces or Evolution’ Empirical Studies of the Arts 27 (2) 159-165.
Divisions: Schools > Psychology, School of
Depositing User: Mr Stephen Grace
Date Deposited: 09 Feb 2010 11:54
Last Modified: 27 Sep 2012 12:00
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10552/569

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item