Dickins, Benjamin J.A. and Dickins, David W. and Dickins, Thomas E. (2008) ‘Is this conjectural phenotypic dichotomy a plausible outcome of genomic imprinting? (Commentary)’, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 31(3), pp. 267-268. (10.1017/S0140525X08004287).
Use this permanent URL when citing or linking to this resource in ROAR.
What is the status of the dichotomy proposed and the nosological validity of the contrasting pathologies described? How plausibly can dysregulated imprinting explain the array of features described, compared with other genetic models? We believe that considering alternative models is more likely to lead in the long term to the correct classification and explanation of the component behaviours.
|Divisions:||Schools > Psychology, School of|
|Additional Information:||Citation: Dickins, B.J.A., Dickins, D.W., & Dickins, T.E. (2008) Is this conjectural phenotypic dichotomy a plausible outcome of genomic imprinting? (Commentary) Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 31 (3) 267-268.|
|Date Deposited:||11 Feb 2010 16:32|
|Creators:||Dickins, Benjamin J.A. and Dickins, David W. and Dickins, Thomas E.|
|Last Modified:||27 Sep 2012 12:01|
|Depositing User:||Stephen Grace|