Methodological pluralism in qualitative research: Reflections on a meta-study

Article

Barnes, Jemima, Caddick, Nick, Clarke, Nicola J., Cromby, John, McDermott, Hilary, Willis, M. and Wiltshire, Gareth 2014. Methodological pluralism in qualitative research: Reflections on a meta-study. Qualitative Methods in Psychology. 17 (Spring).
AuthorsBarnes, Jemima, Caddick, Nick, Clarke, Nicola J., Cromby, John, McDermott, Hilary, Willis, M. and Wiltshire, Gareth
Abstract

A short report is provided of a meta-study of methodological pluralism in qualitative research; that is, of the use of two or more qualitative methods to analyse the same data set. Ten eligible papers were identified and assessed. Their contents are described with respect to theory, methods and findings, and their possible implications discussed in relation to a series of wider debates in qualitative research more generally.

JournalQualitative Methods in Psychology
Journal citation17 (Spring)
Year2014
PublisherBritish Psychological Society (South west Review)
Accepted author manuscript
License
CC BY
Web address (URL)https://shop.bps.org.uk/publications/publication-by-series/qualitative-methods-in-psychology-bulletin/qmip-bulletin-issue-17-spring-2014.html
Publication dates
PrintJan 2014
Publication process dates
Deposited22 May 2017
Copyright informationThis is a pre-publication version of the following article: Barnes, J., Caddick, N., Cromby, J., Clarke, N.J., Mcdermott, H., Willis, M.E. and Wiltshire, G., 2014. Methodological pluralism in qualitative research: reflections on a meta-study. British Psychological Society (SW Review), QMiP Bulletin Issue 17, Spring, 2014, 35-41. Special Issue: The place of qualitative methods in mixed methods research.
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/85qz0

Log in to edit

Download files

Accepted author manuscript
Methodological pluralism in qualitative research (Barnes et al 2014) M Willis.pdf
License: CC BY

  • 343
    total views
  • 395
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 10
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis of the experience of being diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder
Gordon, H. B. and Willis, M. 2023. An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis of the experience of being diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder. Journal of Critical Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy. 23 (4), pp. 37-51.
Making sense of burnout: A reflexive thematic analysis of how teachers in England discuss and encounter the term burnout.
Soames, M. and Willis, M. 2023. Making sense of burnout: A reflexive thematic analysis of how teachers in England discuss and encounter the term burnout. Qualitative Health Research. 34 (1-2), pp. 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732323120363
Critical Realism and Qualitative Research in Psychology
Willis, M. 2022. Critical Realism and Qualitative Research in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 20 (2), pp. 265-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2022.2157782
Meta-Study
Ronkainen, N., Wiltshire, G. and Willis, M. 2022. Meta-Study. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 15 (1), pp. 226-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1931941
Bodies, Representations, Situations, Practices: qualitative research on affect, emotion and feeling
Willis, M. and Cromby, J. 2019. Bodies, Representations, Situations, Practices: qualitative research on affect, emotion and feeling. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1656361
How young adults in London experience the Clubhouse Model of mental health recovery: a thematic analysis
Pardi, Jane and Willis, M. 2018. How young adults in London experience the Clubhouse Model of mental health recovery: a thematic analysis. Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health. 5 (2), pp. 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-018-0124-2
England’s Dreaming? UK critical psychology
Cromby, John and Willis, M. 2013. England’s Dreaming? UK critical psychology. Annual Review of Critical Psychology.
Nudging into subjectification: Governmentality and psychometrics
Cromby, John and Willis, M. 2013. Nudging into subjectification: Governmentality and psychometrics. Critical Social Policy. 34 (2), pp. 241-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018313500868
Analytical Pluralism in Qualitative Research: A Meta-Study
Clarke, Nicola J., Willis, M., Barnes, Jemima S., Caddick, Nick, Cromby, John, McDermott, Hilary and Wiltshire, Gareth 2014. Analytical Pluralism in Qualitative Research: A Meta-Study. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 12 (2), pp. 182-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.948980
Affect--or feeling (after Leys)
Cromby, J. and Willis, M. 2016. Affect--or feeling (after Leys). Theory & Psychology. 26 (4), pp. 476-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354316651344
A critical narrative analysis of shared decision-making in acute, inpatient mental health care
Stacey, Gemma, Felton, Anne, Morgan, Alastair, Stickley, Theo, Willis, M., Diamond, Bob, Houghton, Philip, Johnson, Beverley and Dumenya, John 2016. A critical narrative analysis of shared decision-making in acute, inpatient mental health care. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 30 (1), pp. 35-41.
Informed, Involved and Influential: The 3 I's model of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care
Stacey, Gemma, Felton, Anne, Houghton, Philip, Hui, Ada, Morgan, Alastair, Shutt, James, Diamond, Bob, Willis, M. and Stickley, Theo 2015. Informed, Involved and Influential: The 3 I's model of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care. Mental Health Practice. 19 (4), pp. 31-35.