Anarchism’s Posthuman Future

Article


Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2018. Anarchism’s Posthuman Future. Anarchist Studies. 26 (1).
AuthorsCudworth, E. and Hobden, S.
Abstract

In previous work, we have argued that there are considerable areas of overlap between anarchism and complexity thinking, in particular because both explore the possibilities for the development of order without a specific source of authority. In more recent interventions we have developed a posthuman world view as a political project based on a foundation in complexity thinking. Hierarchical and exclusive forms of social organisation are usually understood by anarchists to be forms of domination. It is unsurprising then, that the history of anarchist thought and practical political engagement demonstrates a concern with an eclectic range of dominations. In this paper, we argue that in questioning our treatment of the environment, or ‘nature’ and in problematising some of our relations with non-human beings and things, some anarchism usefully informs the politics of posthumanism.
We trace the past and contemporary linkages between anarchism and posthumanist thinking, drawing on literature in the overlapping fields of political ecologism, new materialism and animal studies. However, we also argue that there is a contradiction embedded in arguments for the liberation of human and non-human beings and things and a recognition that our world was ever more-than-human. The western conception of the human as an autonomous, rational being able to make decisions and choices about actions has only developed alongside, and in contradistinction to, the ‘animal’. These conceptions of autonomy and rationality have been important to all western left political projects, including much of the politics of ecologism and anarchism, where the notion of ‘freedom’ is writ large. If anarchism is to have a posthuman future, we consider that it needs to interrogate and
perhaps loosen its ties to some established conceptual building blocks of the western political tradition.

JournalAnarchist Studies
Journal citation26 (1)
ISSN0967-3393
Year2018
PublisherLawrence and Wishart
Accepted author manuscript
Web address (URL)https://www.lwbooks.co.uk/anarchist-studies/26-1/anarchisms-posthuman-future
Publication dates
Online2018
Publication process dates
Deposited19 Sep 2017
Accepted2017
Accepted2017
Copyright information© 2018 Lawrence and Wishart
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/84952

Download files

  • 384
    total views
  • 535
    total downloads
  • 6
    views this month
  • 8
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Animalizing International Relations
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2023. Animalizing International Relations. International Relations. 37 (3), pp. 398-422. https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178231192345
Critical Theory and International Relations: Knowledge, Power and Practice
Hobden, S. 2023. Critical Theory and International Relations: Knowledge, Power and Practice. Manchester University Press.
Zoonotic Politics: The Impossible Bordering of the Leaky Boundaries of Species
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2022. Zoonotic Politics: The Impossible Bordering of the Leaky Boundaries of Species. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 50 (3), p. 647–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298221110921
Muddied Living: making home with dog companions
Cudworth, E. 2019. Muddied Living: making home with dog companions. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 41 (3/4), pp. 424-439. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-08-2019-0165
‘Now, where were we?’ The highs and lows of hunting data with a research pack
Cudworth, E. 2018. ‘Now, where were we?’ The highs and lows of hunting data with a research pack. Journal of Sociology. 54 (4), pp. 488-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783318816761
Anthropocene, Capitalocene and Liberal Cosmopolitan IR: A Response to Burke et al.’s Planet Politics
Chandler, D., Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2017. Anthropocene, Capitalocene and Liberal Cosmopolitan IR: A Response to Burke et al.’s Planet Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 46 (2), pp. 190-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817715247
Introduction
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2017. Introduction. in: The Emancipatory Project of Posthumanism Routledge.
Being "a Good Animal": Adorno, Posthumanism, and International Relations
Hobden, S. 2015. Being "a Good Animal": Adorno, Posthumanism, and International Relations. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 40 (3-4), pp. 251-263.
Analysing Change: Complex Rather than Dialectical?
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2014. Analysing Change: Complex Rather than Dialectical? Globalizations. 11 (5), pp. 627-642.
Liberation for Straw Dogs? Old Materialism, New Materialism, and the Challenge of an Emancipatory Posthumanism
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2014. Liberation for Straw Dogs? Old Materialism, New Materialism, and the Challenge of an Emancipatory Posthumanism. Globalizations. 12 (1), pp. 134-148.
A Sociology for Other Animals: Analysis, advocacy, intervention
Cudworth, E. 2016. A Sociology for Other Animals: Analysis, advocacy, intervention. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 36 (3-4), pp. 242-257.
Posthuman Community in the Edgelands
Cudworth, E. 2017. Posthuman Community in the Edgelands. Society and Animals. 25 (4), pp. 384-403. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341452
Killing animals: sociology, species relations and institutionalized violence
Cudworth, E. 2015. Killing animals: sociology, species relations and institutionalized violence. The Sociological Review. 63 (1), pp. 1-18.
The posthuman way of war
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2015. The posthuman way of war. Security Dialogue. 46 (6), pp. 513-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010615596499
Civilisation and the Domination of the Animal
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2014. Civilisation and the Domination of the Animal. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 42 (3), pp. 746-766.
Of Parts and Wholes: International Relations beyond the Human
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2013. Of Parts and Wholes: International Relations beyond the Human. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 41 (3), pp. 430-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813485875