Dickins, Thomas E. and Dickins, Benjamin J.A. (2008) ‘Mother nature's tolerant ways: Why non-genetic inheritance has nothing to do with evolution’, New Ideas in Psychology, 26(1), pp. 41-54.
Dickins, T.E. (2008) NIIP 26 (1) 41-54.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives.
Download (143Kb) | Preview
Recently a number of theorists have suggested that evolution can use non-genetic or environmental inheritance to pass on adaptations (e.g. Mameli, 2004). Furthermore, it has been suggested that non-genetic, or environmental factors, can play a central role in the process of evolution that is not captured by the neo-Darwinian view which places natural selection centre-stage (e.g. Odling-Smee, Laland & Feldman, 2003). In this paper we present and clarify neo-Darwinian theory and then take issue with the notions of contemporary gene-centred selection and inheritance that non-genetic inheritance theorists have used. We claim that they have misunderstood the distinction and relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic inheritance and we clarify this with a number of examples from the behavioural and biological sciences. According to this analysis there is no such thing as biologically independent non-genetic inheritance, all extrinsic inheritance is a consequence of traits and dispositions that are intrinsic to an organism and intrinsic design can only be explained through neo-Darwinism. We point to the implications this view has for current conceptions of cultural evolution.
|Additional Information:||Citation: Dickins, Thomas E & Dickins, Benjamin J.A. (2008) ‘Mother nature's tolerant ways: Why non-genetic inheritance has nothing to do with evolution’ New Ideas in Psychology 26 (1) 41-54.|
|Divisions:||Schools > Psychology, School of|
|Depositing User:||Mr Stephen Grace|
|Date Deposited:||05 Feb 2010 16:40|
|Last Modified:||27 Sep 2012 12:01|
Actions (login required)